Energy Efficiency Policy: A Market-Based Program Approach

Posted by Jennifer Chiodo on Mar 6, 2013 5:00:00 AM

Today ratepayers in many states are making large investments in energy efficiency. I am a passionate advocate for the need to invest in cost effective improvements to our building infrastructure. However, I am concerned that many efficiency programs are taking short cuts to attain near-term goals that will undermine the market’s ability to generate deeper and more lasting efficiency improvements over time.

After years of working with energy efficiency programs in multiple states, I have concluded that 11 factors affect a program's capacity to generate short-term versus long-term energy efficiency improvements.

  1. Program role: Who is involved and what is the connection to the current market?
  2. Outreach: Which audiences are being reached and is education and training included?
  3. Recruitment: Who is involved in recruiting end users into the program?
  4. Opportunity assessment: Who is involved in assessing efficiency opportunities?
  5. Implementation: What is the process for selecting contractors to implement the efficiency measures?
  6. Verification: Who is responsible for verification, and are results shared with the end user?
  7. Spillover: Is there an easy way for efficiency measures to be shared beyond the immediate projects?
  8. Market development: Is there a market investment made at the practitioner and end user level?
  9. Job creation: How many jobs are created, at what level, and for how long?
  10. Short-term outlook: How quickly and how likely is it that near-term goals will be met?
  11. Long-term outlook: Is energy efficiency embedded into the market at a sustainable cost to ratepayers?

The following table summarizes my comparison of a market-based model to a program-centric model for energy efficiency program delivery and the pros and cons of each.

Energy Efficiency Program Delivery Model Comparison: Market‐based vs. Program‐based

In order to achieve deep and lasting cost reductions from energy efficiency, I think we need public policies that support a market-based approach. What do you think -- and why?

Topics: Public Policy, Energy Efficiency

Subscribe to Email Updates

Follow Us

Contact Us

cc© 2012-2015, Cx Associates. Content on the Building Energy Resilience blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License to share as much as you like. Please attribute to Building Energy Resilience and link to BuildingEnergyResilience

Creative Commons License may not apply to images used within posts and pages on this website. See hover-over or links for attribution associated with each image and licensing